• 1.29K Posts
  • 2.91K Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2024

help-circle




  • ESH

    @Unruffled: MBFC is absolutely terrible. Plenty of people have given examples, but just to name a few:

    • https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/al-jazeera/ - Al Jazeera is rated “mixed” factually. They are, objectively, a top-notch news organization. The issue is they’re anti-Israel (not even in a partisan way, just in a “look at these war crimes which are objectively war crimes” type of way instead of tiptoeing around certain facts to be nice to Western governments)
    • https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/ - MSNBC is “mixed” factually. I looked into some of the claimed reasons, and it was things like they had a guest on, the guest said something misleading or made a mistake, and then the host corrected them.

    Contrast with:

    • https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/ - The New York Post is “mixed” factually, to give you a sense of what that categorization means
    • https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/ - The New York Times is “high” factually, despite the fact that they’ve had at least one major factual-reporting scandal in the very recent past (some but not all of the elements of their reporting of sexual assaults by Hamas during the October 8th attacks were fabricated, people were raising concerns pre-publication that they were fabricated, and they reported them anyway)

    And so on. It’s just, basically, one person’s subjective opinion of what he thinks about various news sources.

    If you want to do this task of categorizing news sources, just use the Wikipedia Perennial Sources list. That one’s peer-reviewed by a huge team of people who care a lot, qualified feedback is taken seriously and used to improve the list, there’s a ton more transparency, it is just better in every respect.

    @Deceptichum: As with almost every time someone gathers mod action, it’s not what you said, it’s how you said it. You were abrasive and insulting for no reason at all. You’re not wrong, but IMO you pretty much deserved the mod action because you were being a cock. I think if you’d responded to the pretty reasonable (if phrased a little bit hostile) question by just answering the reasonable question, you would have been fine. The mods here seem fairly reasonable in most cases, but most people will respond poorly to being cursed at and insulted out of nowhere.




  • Bureaucracy is one of the super-powers of modern civilization. It keeps the water clean, it keeps the food growing, it makes sure that someone who knows the right people can’t just drive drunk because everyone in a position of power can keep them out of trouble. Having an organized system for things, and then consistently applying it so that problems can be fixed systemically and then the fix can stick in place, is the only way we have billions and billions of people on the planet right now instead of little chaotic scattered settlements.

    Like any superpower it creates new problems that it introduces. Some people might say the settlements would be a better idea. But it solves a whole bunch of problems too, and the idea that it’s inherently an evil thing is along the exact same lines as “the servers always run fine, why do we pay an IT department?”











  • Agreed. The outlandish stuff is actually a little bit safer. Actually dangerous geopolitical stuff that might kick off something he can’t control, because it might realistically happen, he avoids like the plague unless it carries some kind of strong benefit to him personally. He just likes to talk shit because it’s fun. I don’t think it is any more complicated than that.

    I suspect that this is why Musk was brought in. Musk is actually willing to take an axe to the main pillars of the building, in a lot more energetic and systematized fashion than Trump would be inclined to.


  • Ha, fair enough. I won’t say you are wrong about someone doing that. My observation has been:

    1. Lemmy has vanishingly few people who are actually racist/transphobic/in favor of genocide/whatever
    2. Lemmy has a ton of people who are convinced that those people are all over the place, and devote a really substantial amount of mental energy into trying to find something they can misinterpret as being one of those things and then go on the attack (also periodically assuring one another that there are definitely a ton of those people all over the place, and attacking them to each other)

    My advice would be to avoid the places where group 2 likes to congregate, because they tend to be silly places that will give people a distorted view of what’s real after a while.



  • Your quote marks and your original question sound like you’re really trying hard to find something offensive about the way I am saying it. Good luck! I hope you find some enemies you can be performatively anti-racist against, if that is in fact your goal. If that’s not your goal, then I would modify your language, because you’re making it sound like that’s your goal, and there are better things to be upset about in the modern day than being hyper-vigilant about anything that sounds offensive and then then proudly pointing out to everyone that it’s offensive.

    (Well, I mean yes, the nature of the system is offensive, and I’m aiming to be direct about how it behaves, so in that sense maybe my language is offensive. I think it is extremely clear that the system is meant for Khalil, though, and he’s not Hispanic. He is brown. I said what I said, the way I said it, for a reason.)






  • I think mostly it is revealing about Schumer’s priorities. He has a government job. If everything within the buildings in Washington DC is mostly still working the way it’s supposed to, then at the end of the day he still gets a paycheck and some important stuff to do every day. Lots of people across the US going through upheaval, losing their jobs, maybe getting detained indefinitely or not, journalists getting threatened, all that stuff isn’t, like, good, but it’s also not an existential threat to him. The government shutting down would be.

    And so, avoiding that is a key priority of his. It’s urgent. All that other stuff is not.




  • These white people:

    https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/04/world/german-detained-ice-intl-latam/index.html

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c80y3yx1jdyo

    The point that I’m making, pointing out that they’re white, is that the news is all of a sudden concerned about them, because they’re white, because the news is racist. Brown people have been going through that same horrifying system for years and years now, and because they “belonged there” or something, unlike those pretty white girls who do not, no one gave a shit.

    (I mean, no one in a position to free them cares about the white girls either, but the news is at least acknowledging that it’s something bad that this is happening to them. They talk to family members, emphasize that they didn’t really do anything wrong, that kind of thing. It’s like some kind of confusing terrible mistake that the system is suddenly being weaponized on these innocent people. When brown people are reported to be suffering those same abuses, or much much worse, they’re reported on in a much more abstract way. Like animals that are having trouble surviving in some particular environment, but not like a problem.)